Skip to main content

Decoding Myth and Law: Bombay High Court's Verdict on Sex Selection Propagation



Introduction:
The Bombay High Court recently addressed a batch of petitions challenging the quashing of an order by an Additional Sessions Judge under the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 (PCPNDT Act). The case involved a Kirtankar, a public speaker, who allegedly propagated techniques for conceiving a male child during a religious discourse. The court examined whether the statements made constituted an offense under the PCPNDT Act and determined that the communication in the religious discourse qualified as an advertisement. This blog explores the court's ruling and its implications for the trial.

Background:
The respondent, a Kirtankar with influence in rural and semi-urban areas, addressed a gathering where he shared extracts from religious and Ayurvedic books, claiming they provided techniques for conceiving a male child. He asserted that sexual relations on even dates would result in a male child, while odd dates would lead to a female child. Additionally, he mentioned that the position of the fetus in the womb after six months determined its gender. A complaint was filed, alleging that the respondent propagated sex selection and violated the provisions of the PCPNDT Act.

The Trial and Revision:
The magistrate found that the respondent's actions fell under the definition of "sex selection" and issued a process against him. However, the Sessions Judge, in a criminal revision, rejected the allegations, stating that the statements made during the religious discourse did not constitute the propagation of sex selection. The revision was allowed, and the order of process issuance was quashed.

The High Court's Ruling:
The Bombay High Court reviewed the case and determined that the Sessions Judge's findings were erroneous. The court acknowledged that no modern or established technique was propagated in this instance. Nonetheless, the court held that the communication in the religious discourse qualified as an advertisement under the PCPNDT Act. It emphasized that the term "advertisement propagation" should be interpreted broadly and not limited to clinical diagnostic centers or modern techniques. The court noted that the respondent not only advertised but also claimed the information to be scientifically sound and legally valid.

Implications and Conclusion:
The court concluded that there was sufficient material to establish a prima facie case against the respondent and ordered the trial court to proceed with the trial. However, it cautioned against equating the dissemination of knowledge in books for academic purposes with the acts alleged in this case. The court dismissed one petition for lack of locus standi, allowed other petitions, and restored the trial court's order. The court also directed the trial court to conduct the trial without being influenced by the observations made in this matter. 
The Bombay High Court's decision to proceed with the trial for the propagation of sex selection in a religious discourse signifies the judiciary's commitment to combating harmful practices. It highlights the need to critically evaluate Indian rituals and beliefs, particularly when they conflict with legal frameworks designed to protect individual rights and promote social progress. By encouraging education, awareness, and legal reforms, it is possible to foster a society that respects cultural heritage while upholding principles of equality and justice. Only through a comprehensive and critical examination of our beliefs can we create a more inclusive and harmonious future for all.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How To Overcome Your Fear of Public Speaking? An Easy Guide

Imagine the countless opportunities missed due to fear and low self-esteem. Now envision the possibilities that could have been seized if these obstacles were not in the way. In this guide, I will provide you with practical steps to conquer your fear of public speaking and enhance your self-esteem. By following these strategies, you will gain the confidence to express yourself freely in meetings, functions, or even during a TED Talk. Step 1 – Accept your Shortcomings The more honest you are with yourself, the higher the chances of becoming aware of your shortcomings. This honesty will help you recognize your weaknesses and areas where you fall behind. Suppose you are not good at speaking, and you want to overcome it; the first thing you should be doing is acknowledging that you are lagging behind in it. Without acknowledging your shortcomings, there won't be any scope for improvement. Developing self-awareness is very important for progress. Step-2 – Greeting Anxiety Research on mi...

Why Caste-Based Reservation Is Still Needed in India

Introduction   You think the age of reservations based on caste should be over in India. That casteism is a relic of the past and in today's modern society, reservations do more harm than good by promoting divisions and unfair advantages. You couldn't be more wrong. The caste system is alive and well in India, even if it's often politely ignored in public discourse. Inter-caste marriage is still rare. Systemic discrimination and the economic and social legacy of caste are realities that still shape life outcomes. For those in lower castes, an inferiority complex is ingrained from an early age. Until the caste system is truly dismantled, and its effects reversed, reservations are still needed to promote equal opportunity and representation. To argue otherwise is to ignore the stark inequities still at play in Indian society. The age of caste may not be over, but the age of willful blindness should be. The Realities of Caste Inequality in India The caste system is still deepl...

The Elephant in the Room

The Past The buzz surrounding the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) did not start recently but has a long history dating back to the colonial era. Initially, the purpose of the UCC was to bring uniformity to penal laws rather than personal laws. However, views on the applicability and functionality of the UCC have changed since independence, giving rise to numerous questions. Many scholars believed that in a pluralistic country like India, implementing a UCC would be impractical. Throughout history, whenever a discussion on the UCC arose, the government tended to push it through without extensive deliberation. Another concern related to the UCC was whether it should be included in Part III or Part IV of the Constitution. Ultimately, it was decided that the UCC should fall under the Directive Principles of State Policy and not under fundamental rights. The word “Uniform Civil Code” is clearly included in Part IV, Article 44 of the Indian Constitution. The Shah Bano case, filed in 1985, raise...